As a scout, it is important to have a grading scale that is both easy to understand for both the writer and the reader. My scale isn’t mine per se, it’s very similar to the scale that I learned from Matt Manocherian’s scout school, but I expanded upon it. It consists of two scales: One is used to determine how good a player is at a certain trait, and the other gives an overall view of the prospect. Here we’ll talk about the scale used for individual traits. Note that all grades will be given considering what the player is NOW not what we think the player will become.
9: A player with this number will enter the NFL the very best at this trait. Nines are the cream of the crop and it’s a very rare grade. Think Josh Allen’s arm strength coming out of college or Lamar Jackson’s mobility.
8: This trait will stand out constantly on tape. Will put the player in the top 5 at that trait within his position. A good example would be Marquise Brown’s play speed.
7: This trait will stand out often on tape. Will put the player in the top third of starters at his position.
6: The trait will be present and stand out occasionally on tape. This is the line where we decide whether a prospect’s trait is sufficient enough to be a solid NFL starter.
5: The trait will be present but won’t stand out on film. This number states that the player is effective as a college starter, but won’t be good enough to be a starter at the next level. Sufficient for a backup or a role player.
4: The trait will be absent from tape. Below average at the college level. A red fag.
3: The trait will be glaringly absent from tape. A trait that would need to be fixed or drastically schemed in order to see the field. A big red flag.
2-1: Very Poor. Reject.
X: A trait that is unknown due to not being asked to do that said trait. Think of grading the hands of a running back who only receives one target. Not enough sample size to make a conclusion.